![mory hard diarey mory hard diarey](https://www.13or-du-hiphop.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/daddy-mory-mory-320x320.jpg)
![mory hard diarey mory hard diarey](https://i.redd.it/pjfbr2yy8jr21.png)
Detailing the work that had been undertaken so far and extending it by drawing it together it will aim on presenting a ‘new social contract’ as point of reference of analysis of current developments and as outline for developing directions for the future. Some preliminary studies on different aspects had been already taken up in previous own work. As such we are concerned with a combined approach to human-right law and constitutional law.įourth, the latter reference – to constitutional law – highlights the inclusion of a strong emphasis of social practice. Third, any such approach can only be meaningful if it refers to a rights-based perspective on social security – however, here another addition is proposed, namely one that highlights the pre-juridical, normative conditions. Second the theory of regulation as developed in French political economy, dealing with accumulation regimes and modes of regulation, is proposed in a widened understanding: first it includes two further distinct aspects, namely living regime and mode of life second, instead of maintaining the limited view on capitalist societies – namely the capitalist form of accumulation – it is suggested to open the concept towards an understanding that is not only concerned with profit-oriented processes within a utilitarian system but also open to generating social values in a collective system. As meta-theory it helps to maintain such a localist focus and provide at the same time a meaningful perspective for tracing global developments, acknowledging their specificity. Theoretical and methodological points of reference are taken from four areas:įirst the theory of social quality which allows an understanding of the social that is based in focussing on the production and reproduction of everyday’s life. Focussing on five main tensions, namely the overproduction of goods and the turn of goods into ‘bads’ societal abundance versus inequality of access abundance of knowledge and its misdirection towards skills the individualisation of problems and their emergence as societal threat and the complexity of government and the limited scope of governance, it will be possible to elaborate an understanding of societal development and required politics and policies that go beyond particularist approaches, allowing the elaboration of a pathway towards sustainable socio-economic development. I suggest the need for a fourth way that is necessary in research, highlighting the conditions and the objectives pushed towards a system that goes beyond a linear extrapolation of current trends without changing the baseline on which it rests. political institutionalism and a related legal understanding of social security and responsibility, economics and its concern with generating profit, technological conditions of value generation) which determines the direction of defining challenges and also of searching for an answer. How can we utilise the changes in order to secure continued growth and obtain a trickle-down effect for a general improvement of living conditions?Įach of these approaches has a very specific and tightly defined focus from where it departs (e.g.How can we re-establish and maintain the status quo ante of the traditional Worlds of Welfare Capitalism?.What is actually happening and how can we gain a comprehensive picture of the changes?.The three main areas of contemporary studies can be presented by the following lead questions: Changes in the broad, ill-defined area of socio-economic and industrial development – commonly linked to catchwords as ‘industry 4.0’, ‘big-data-revolution’ or more specifically ‘Uberisation’ – are of multiple interest as they pose questions concerned with foundations of the entire social fabric.